Difference between revisions of "2023 Hugos"

From Fancyclopedia 3
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(update re seated Worldcons. What we need now is the full list of *all* ineligibles, and Divya's refusal)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The 2023 [[Hugo Awards]], for works disseminated in 2022, were presented at [[Chengdu Worldcon]], the 81st [[Worldcon]], on Sunday October 21 and caused an unprecedented controversy when the voting details were released three months later.
 
The 2023 [[Hugo Awards]], for works disseminated in 2022, were presented at [[Chengdu Worldcon]], the 81st [[Worldcon]], on Sunday October 21 and caused an unprecedented controversy when the voting details were released three months later.
  
The [[concom]]'s Hugo Awards Subcommittee, also called Hugo Awards Selection Executive Department of the [[WSFS]] Division, were [[Dave McCarty]] (Administrator or Co-Head; also one of the con's 11 Vice Chairs), [[Ben Yalow]], [[Chen Shi]]<ref>陈石 – on the Chengdu website, press releases etc. sometimes reversed into the Western order as Shi CHEN. This is also the form used on WSFS's Hugo website but without the clarifying capitals for the family name, which can lead to mistaking this for the real name as used commonly. Also uses the [[nickname]] Raistlin Chen.</ref> (both Co-Heads of the WSFS Division and two of the three con Co-Chairs); [[Ann Marie Rudolph]], [[Diane Lacey]], [[Jiang Zhenyu]],<ref>姜振宇 – or reversed Zhenyu JIANG. [https://en.chengduworldcon.com/news20/ Chengdu’s website also suggests] Jiang was the other department Co-Head.</ref> [[Joe Yao]], [[Tina Wang]], [[Guo Dongsheng]],<ref>郭东升 – or reversed Dongsheng GUO</ref> [[Pang Bo]].<ref>庞博 – or reversed Bo PANG.</ref>
+
The [[concom]]'s Hugo Awards Subcommittee, also called "Hugo Awards Selection Executive Department" of the [[WSFS]] Division, were [[Dave McCarty]] (Administrator or Co-Head; also one of the con's 11 Vice Chairs), [[Ben Yalow]], [[Chen Shi]]<ref>陈石 – on the Chengdu website, press releases etc. sometimes reversed into the Western order as Shi CHEN. This is also the form used on WSFS's Hugo website but without the clarifying capitals for the family name, which can lead to mistaking this for the real name as used commonly. Also uses the [[nickname]] Raistlin Chen.</ref> (both Co-Heads of the WSFS Division and two of the three con Co-Chairs), [[Ann Marie Rudolph]], [[Diane Lacey]], [[Jiang Zhenyu]],<ref>姜振宇 – or reversed Zhenyu JIANG. [https://en.chengduworldcon.com/news20/ Chengdu’s website also suggests] Jiang was the other department Co-Head.</ref> [[Joe Yao]], [[Tina Wang]], [[Guo Dongsheng]],<ref>郭东升 – or reversed Dongsheng GUO</ref> [[Pang Bo]].<ref>庞博 – or reversed Bo PANG.</ref>
  
 
The nominations opened on March 1 and ran until April 30. As reported by the con, 1,847 valid nominating ballots (1843 electronic and 4 paper) were received and counted from members of Chengdu and [[Chicon 8]], the 2022 Worldcon. To sort fiction in Chinese to length categories, the conversion factor of 1.6 Chinese characters to an English word was used.<ref> [https://en.chengduworldcon.com/news3_35_95_32_66_76_50/102.html Chengdu Worldcon website.]</ref>  
 
The nominations opened on March 1 and ran until April 30. As reported by the con, 1,847 valid nominating ballots (1843 electronic and 4 paper) were received and counted from members of Chengdu and [[Chicon 8]], the 2022 Worldcon. To sort fiction in Chinese to length categories, the conversion factor of 1.6 Chinese characters to an English word was used.<ref> [https://en.chengduworldcon.com/news3_35_95_32_66_76_50/102.html Chengdu Worldcon website.]</ref>  
  
The nominees were announced on July, 7. The final voting ran from July, 10 until October, 1. There were 1,674 valid Finalist ballots cast, the lowest number in the past decade, over 500 fewer than in [[2022 Hugos]].<ref>[https://file770.com/inside-the-2023-hugo-finalist-voting-statistics/ ''File 770''.]</ref>
+
The nominees were announced on July, 7. The final voting ran from July, 10 until October, 1. There were 1,674 valid Finalist ballots reported, the lowest number in the past decade, over 500 fewer than in [[2022 Hugos]].<ref>[https://file770.com/inside-the-2023-hugo-finalist-voting-statistics/ ''File 770''.]</ref>
  
 
==Controversy==
 
==Controversy==
 
Both nominations and final voting were delayed from the usual timeline and the convention's earlier promises.
 
Both nominations and final voting were delayed from the usual timeline and the convention's earlier promises.
  
Chengdu's belated ''[[Progress Report]]'' 2 of July, 17 said (p. 5):
+
Chengdu's belated and final ''[[Progress Report]]'' 2 of July, 17 said (p. 5):
 
  Eligible members vote according to the “one person, one vote” rule to select Hugo Award works and individuals that comply with local laws and regulations. The Chengdu organizing committee will review the nominated works and validate the votes.
 
  Eligible members vote according to the “one person, one vote” rule to select Hugo Award works and individuals that comply with local laws and regulations. The Chengdu organizing committee will review the nominated works and validate the votes.
  
The "local laws" part caused some comments at the time<ref>[https://file770.com/chengdu-worldcon-publishes-progress-report-2/ ''File 770.'']</ref> but was largely ignored and found significant only in the hindsight.<ref>[https://www.cheryl-morgan.com/?p=29404 “A Smoking Gun,”] [[Cheryl Morgan]], January 24, 2024.</ref>
+
The "local laws" part caused some comments at the time<ref>[https://file770.com/chengdu-worldcon-publishes-progress-report-2/#comments Comments at "Chengdu Worldcon Publishes Progress Report"], ''[[File 770]]'' 17 July 2023</ref> but was largely forgotten and found significant only in the hindsight.<ref> [https://www.cheryl-morgan.com/?p=29404 “A Smoking Gun,”] [[Cheryl Morgan]], January 24, 2024.</ref>
  
 
While it is usual to release the Finalist voting numbers immediately after the ceremony, Chengdu did so over six weeks later on December 3, 2023.<ref>[https://file770.com/2023-hugo-finalist-voting-statistics-posted/ ''File 770.'']</ref>
 
While it is usual to release the Finalist voting numbers immediately after the ceremony, Chengdu did so over six weeks later on December 3, 2023.<ref>[https://file770.com/2023-hugo-finalist-voting-statistics-posted/ ''File 770.'']</ref>
  
The details of the nominating ballots and [[EPH]] tables were released only on Saturday, January 20, 2024, the last possible date per [[WSFS Constitution]], and immediately [[All Fandom Was Plunged Into War]] since a number of nominees, including ''Babel'' by [[R. F. Kuang]] for the [[Best Novel Hugo]], [[Paul Weimer]] for the [[Best Fan Writer Hugo]], [[Xiran Jay Zhao]] for the [[Astounding Award]], and the episode “The Sound of Her Wings” from [[Neil Gaiman]]'s ''The Sandman'' TV series for [[Best Dramatic Presentation, Short Form]], as well as some Chinese works, had been declared ineligible with no explanation, and there were various irregularities in the numbers.
+
The details of the nominating ballots and [[EPH]] tables were released only on Saturday, January 20, 2024, the last possible date per [[WSFS Constitution]], and immediately [[All Fandom Was Plunged Into War]] since a number of nominees (see below) had been declared ineligible with no explanation, and there were various irregularities in the numbers.
  
According to [[Mike Glyer]],
+
[[Mike Glyer]] at ''[[File 770]]'' asked [[Dave McCarty]] about the “not eligible” rulings. [https://file770.com/2023-hugo-nomination-report-has-unexplained-ineligibility-rulings-also-reveals-who-declined His only reply] was
''[[File 770]]'' [https://file770.com/2023-hugo-nomination-report-has-unexplained-ineligibility-rulings-also-reveals-who-declined asked] [[Dave McCarty]], a Chengdu Worldcon [[vice-chair]] and co-head of the Hugo Awards Selection Executive Division", about the “not eligible” rulings. He replied:
 
 
   
 
   
  After reviewing the Constitution and the rules <br>  we must follow, the administration team determined<br>  those works/persons were not eligible.
+
After reviewing the Constitution and the rules we must follow, the administration team determined those works/persons were not eligible.
  
Commenters speculated that “'''the rules we must follow'''” refers to Chinese governmental oversight. McCarty denied on his [[Facebook]] page that either he or anyone on his team acted under government orders, but refused to explain the reasons the particular candidates were deemed ineligible, repeating the one officious sentence and attacking his interlocutors. The expression became an instant [[catchphrase]].  
+
Commenters speculated that “'''the rules we must follow'''” refers to Chinese governmental oversight. The expression became an instant [[catchphrase]]. McCarty on his [[Facebook]] profile (which had for several months served as the only information channel about the Hugo-related developments, or lack thereof) denied that anyone on his team acted under government orders, but refused to explain any further, repeating the one officious sentence and attacking his interlocutors.  
  
[https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_QqmsxQkACoYcxSx2LVqbxD39-DJI_gS/view Committee documents later released] by [[Diane Lacey]] suggest that if direct Chinese government interference wasn’t an issue, then the Hugo administration itself acted to cut out candidates they thought would offend government sensibilities.  
+
== Ineligibles ==
 +
The most notable were:
 +
 
 +
* ''Babel'' by [[R. F. Kuang]] for the [[Best Novel Hugo]] (published in Chinese by the state CITIC Press  in October 2023)
 +
* [[Paul Weimer]] for the [[Best Fan Writer Hugo]]
 +
* [[Xiran Jay Zhao]] for the [[Astounding Award]] (second year of eligibility, finalist in 2022)
 +
* the episode “The Sound of Her Wings” from [[Neil Gaiman]]'s ''The Sandman'' TV series for [[Best Dramatic Presentation, Short Form]]
 +
* several works in Chinese
 +
 
 +
Several further disqualifications were explained by reference to relevant provisions of the [[WSFS Constitution]].
  
 
== Aftermath ==
 
== Aftermath ==
On Tuesday, January 30, 2024, [[Worldcon Intellectual Property]] [https://www.wsfs.org/2024/01/31/announcements-from-worldcon-intellectual-property/ issued an announcement] that it “censured” [[Chen Shi]] and [[Ben Yalow]] (each) "for actions of the Hugo Administration Committee of the Chengdu Worldcon that he presided over", [[Dave McCarty]] for ditto plus "his public comments that have led to harm of the goodwill and value of our marks", and “reprimanded” (this was explained as a “lesser penalty” by [[Donald Eastlake]])<ref>[[Mike Glyer]]'s [https://file770.com/worldcon-intellectual-property-announces-censure-of-mccarty-chen-shi-and-yalow-mccarty-resigns-eastlake-is-new-chair/comment-page-1/#comment-1603406 comment of January 30, 2024, at 10:49 pm].</ref> [[Kevin Standlee]] "for public comments that mistakenly led people to believe that we are not servicing our marks." The same announcement said McCarty resigned from the [[Board]] of [[Directors]] and Standlee as Board of Directors chairman.<ref>[[Donald Eastlake]], previous [[Vice-chair]], was elected the new Chair of the BoD. Per a [https://file770.com/worldcon-intellectual-property-announces-censure-of-mccarty-chen-shi-and-yalow-mccarty-resigns-eastlake-is-new-chair/ follow-up announcement at ''[[File 770]]'' only,] the WSFS [[Mark Protection Committee]] appointed [[Bruce Farr]] (previously non-voting [[Treasurer]]) to the seat emptied by McCarty, up for re-election at the 2024 [[Business Meeting]].</ref>
+
On Tuesday, January 30, 2024, [[Worldcon Intellectual Property]] [https://www.wsfs.org/2024/01/31/announcements-from-worldcon-intellectual-property/ issued an announcement] that it “censured” [[Chen Shi]] and [[Ben Yalow]] (each) "for actions of the Hugo Administration Committee of the Chengdu Worldcon that he presided over", [[Dave McCarty]] for ditto plus "his public comments that have led to harm of the goodwill and value of our marks", and “reprimanded” (this was explained as a “lesser penalty” by [[Donald Eastlake]])<ref>[[Mike Glyer]]'s [https://file770.com/worldcon-intellectual-property-announces-censure-of-mccarty-chen-shi-and-yalow-mccarty-resigns-eastlake-is-new-chair/comment-page-1/#comment-1603406 comment of January 30, 2024, at 10:49 pm].</ref> [[Kevin Standlee]] "for public comments that mistakenly led people to believe that we are not servicing our marks."
  
On Sunday, February 4, at [[Capricon 44]], McCarty gave a 42-minute interview to [[Chris Barkley]], whose 2023 [[Best Fan Writer Hugo]] win may have been affected by the exclusions. It was published on the same day [https://file770.com/barkley-so-glad-you-didnt-ask-81/ as a recording] and a day later [https://file770.com/wp-content/uploads/Dave-McCarty-Interview-Audio-file-cleaned-up.pdf as a transcript.]<ref>PDF 400 kB, 13 pages, 6600 words.</ref> While providing some vague explanations including an "SQL error," it just poured oil into the fire.
+
The same announcement said McCarty resigned from the [[Board]] of [[Directors]] and Standlee as Board of Directors chairman. ([[Donald Eastlake]], previous [[Vice-chair]], was elected the new Chair of the BoD. Per a [https://file770.com/worldcon-intellectual-property-announces-censure-of-mccarty-chen-shi-and-yalow-mccarty-resigns-eastlake-is-new-chair/ follow-up announcement] at ''[[File 770]]'' only, the WSFS [[Mark Protection Committee]] appointed [[Bruce Farr]], previously non-voting [[Treasurer]], to the seat emptied by McCarty, up for re-election at the 2024 [[Business Meeting]].)
  
===Links===
+
On January 30, the [[Seattle 2025]] Worldcon responded to an earlier question that its "team has decided that no member of the 2023 Chengdu Hugo team will be part of our WSFS Division or Hugo team."<ref>https://facebook.com/Seattle2025/posts/912423250883971?comment_id=1340474623312019 , [https://file770.com/pixel-scroll-2-5-24-to-boldly-scroll-where-no-fan-has-scrolled-before/ republished on 5 February (see item 6)] by ''File 770''</ref>
 +
 
 +
On Sunday, February 4, at [[Capricon 44]], McCarty gave a 42-minute interview to [[Chris Barkley]], whose 2023 [[Best Fan Writer Hugo]] win may have been affected by the exclusions. It was published on the same day [https://file770.com/barkley-so-glad-you-didnt-ask-81/ as a recording] and a day later [https://file770.com/wp-content/uploads/Dave-McCarty-Interview-Audio-file-cleaned-up.pdf as a transcript].<ref>PDF 400 kB, 13 pages, 6600 words.</ref> While providing some vague explanations including an "SQL error," it just poured oil into the fire.
 +
 
 +
On the same occasion, Barkley was contacted by [[Diane Lacey]] and provided with several of Hugo Subcommitee's internal e-mails from early June<ref>[https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_QqmsxQkACoYcxSx2LVqbxD39-DJI_gS/ PDF at Google Drive], some as screenshots only</ref> and its eligibility spreadsheet. Together with [[Jason Sanford]] they published these in an investigative report on Wednesday, February 14. The e-mails made clear that (over a month after the nomination ballots were collected, the time supposedly spent by "canonicalisation", i. e. unifying various possible spellings used for the same nominee) McCarty asked other US fans to "highlight anything of a sensitive political nature" from the Chinese viewpoint and they eagerly complied, based either on the works' contents (often guessed second-hand) or authors' expressions on social media etc. (often misunderstanding facts). It is contented whether or how much the Chengdu part of the concom called for such a process, or at least were informed about it after the fact. (The e-mails also mention explicitly only the Novel, Fan Writer and Astounding categories, so other questions, especially re the Dramatic Presentation above, remain open.)
 +
 
 +
While Lacey expressed remorse and apologised for her involvement, [[Kat Jones]], who also took part in this vetting although she was not on the subcommittee, published an unrepentant response.<ref> https://file770.com/2023-hugo-awards-related-statement-by-kat-jones/</ref>
 +
 
 +
On Thursday, February 15 the [[Glasgow 2024]] Worldcon announced that Jones resigned as its Hugo Administrator "and has been removed from the Glasgow 2024 team across all mediums", and reiterated its previous commitment to transparency of the Hugo process.<ref>https://glasgow2024.org/chairs-statement-15th-february-2024/</ref>
 +
 
 +
== Links ==
 
* [https://youtu.be/Fy8qMizbbJM Nominations announcement video] (July 7, 2023).
 
* [https://youtu.be/Fy8qMizbbJM Nominations announcement video] (July 7, 2023).
 
* [https://hugo.chengduworldcon.com Chengdu Worldcon website.]  
 
* [https://hugo.chengduworldcon.com Chengdu Worldcon website.]  
Line 42: Line 60:
 
* [https://camestrosfelapton.wordpress.com/category/hugo-awards/hugo2023/ Hugo 2023 category] at [[Camestros Felapton]], with various analyses of the numbers and discrepancies.
 
* [https://camestrosfelapton.wordpress.com/category/hugo-awards/hugo2023/ Hugo 2023 category] at [[Camestros Felapton]], with various analyses of the numbers and discrepancies.
 
* Reporting in [[mundane]] media:
 
* Reporting in [[mundane]] media:
** [https://www.theguardian.com/books/2024/jan/24/science-fiction-awards-held-in-china-under-fire-for-excluding-authors ''The Guardian'', January 24, 2024. ]
+
** [https://www.theguardian.com/books/2024/jan/24/science-fiction-awards-held-in-china-under-fire-for-excluding-authors ''The Guardian'', Wednesday January 24, 2024.]
** [https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/awards-and-prizes/article/94229-resignations-censures-follow-in-wake-of-hugo-awards-controversy.html ''Publishers Weekly'', February 1, 2024.]
+
** [https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/awards-and-prizes/article/94229-resignations-censures-follow-in-wake-of-hugo-awards-controversy.html ''Publishers Weekly'', Thurdday February 1, 2024.]
** [https://www.esquire.com/entertainment/books/a46612912/science-fiction-hugo-awards-2024/ ''Esquire'', February 2, 2024.]
+
** [https://www.esquire.com/entertainment/books/a46612912/science-fiction-hugo-awards-2024/ ''Esquire'', Friday February 2, 2024.]
* [https://www.facebook.com/story.php/?id=1293423514&story_fbid=10232802432905162 Public apology] by [[Diane Lacey]].  
+
* [https://www.facebook.com/story.php/?id=1293423514&story_fbid=10232802432905162 Public apology] by [[Diane Lacey]] (on Facebook, a copy of her letter that was published in the Report and [https://file770.com/diane-laceys-letter-about-the-2023-hugos/#comments separately at ''File 770'']).
* [https://www.patreon.com/posts/2023-hugo-awards-98498779 The 2023 Hugo Awards: A Report on Censorship and Exclusion] by Chris M. Barkley and [[Jason Sanford]].  
+
* [https://www.patreon.com/posts/2023-hugo-awards-98498779 The 2023 Hugo Awards: A Report on Censorship and Exclusion] by Chris M. Barkley and [[Jason Sanford]]. See also [https://file770.com/the-2023-hugo-awards-a-report-on-censorship-and-exclusion/ copy at ''File 770'', with hundreds of comments].
 
 
 
____
 
____
 
<references />
 
<references />
 
  
 
{{award | year=2023 | parent=Hugos }}
 
{{award | year=2023 | parent=Hugos }}

Revision as of 11:24, 18 February 2024

The 2023 Hugo Awards, for works disseminated in 2022, were presented at Chengdu Worldcon, the 81st Worldcon, on Sunday October 21 and caused an unprecedented controversy when the voting details were released three months later.

The concom's Hugo Awards Subcommittee, also called "Hugo Awards Selection Executive Department" of the WSFS Division, were Dave McCarty (Administrator or Co-Head; also one of the con's 11 Vice Chairs), Ben Yalow, Chen Shi[1] (both Co-Heads of the WSFS Division and two of the three con Co-Chairs), Ann Marie Rudolph, Diane Lacey, Jiang Zhenyu,[2] Joe Yao, Tina Wang, Guo Dongsheng,[3] Pang Bo.[4]

The nominations opened on March 1 and ran until April 30. As reported by the con, 1,847 valid nominating ballots (1843 electronic and 4 paper) were received and counted from members of Chengdu and Chicon 8, the 2022 Worldcon. To sort fiction in Chinese to length categories, the conversion factor of 1.6 Chinese characters to an English word was used.[5]

The nominees were announced on July, 7. The final voting ran from July, 10 until October, 1. There were 1,674 valid Finalist ballots reported, the lowest number in the past decade, over 500 fewer than in 2022 Hugos.[6]

Controversy[edit]

Both nominations and final voting were delayed from the usual timeline and the convention's earlier promises.

Chengdu's belated and final Progress Report 2 of July, 17 said (p. 5):

Eligible members vote according to the “one person, one vote” rule to select Hugo Award works and individuals that comply with local laws and regulations. The Chengdu organizing committee will review the nominated works and validate the votes.

The "local laws" part caused some comments at the time[7] but was largely forgotten and found significant only in the hindsight.[8]

While it is usual to release the Finalist voting numbers immediately after the ceremony, Chengdu did so over six weeks later on December 3, 2023.[9]

The details of the nominating ballots and EPH tables were released only on Saturday, January 20, 2024, the last possible date per WSFS Constitution, and immediately All Fandom Was Plunged Into War since a number of nominees (see below) had been declared ineligible with no explanation, and there were various irregularities in the numbers.

Mike Glyer at File 770 asked Dave McCarty about the “not eligible” rulings. His only reply was

After reviewing the Constitution and the rules we must follow, the administration team determined those works/persons were not eligible.

Commenters speculated that “the rules we must follow” refers to Chinese governmental oversight. The expression became an instant catchphrase. McCarty on his Facebook profile (which had for several months served as the only information channel about the Hugo-related developments, or lack thereof) denied that anyone on his team acted under government orders, but refused to explain any further, repeating the one officious sentence and attacking his interlocutors.

Ineligibles[edit]

The most notable were:

Several further disqualifications were explained by reference to relevant provisions of the WSFS Constitution.

Aftermath[edit]

On Tuesday, January 30, 2024, Worldcon Intellectual Property issued an announcement that it “censured” Chen Shi and Ben Yalow (each) "for actions of the Hugo Administration Committee of the Chengdu Worldcon that he presided over", Dave McCarty for ditto plus "his public comments that have led to harm of the goodwill and value of our marks", and “reprimanded” (this was explained as a “lesser penalty” by Donald Eastlake)[10] Kevin Standlee "for public comments that mistakenly led people to believe that we are not servicing our marks."

The same announcement said McCarty resigned from the Board of Directors and Standlee as Board of Directors chairman. (Donald Eastlake, previous Vice-chair, was elected the new Chair of the BoD. Per a follow-up announcement at File 770 only, the WSFS Mark Protection Committee appointed Bruce Farr, previously non-voting Treasurer, to the seat emptied by McCarty, up for re-election at the 2024 Business Meeting.)

On January 30, the Seattle 2025 Worldcon responded to an earlier question that its "team has decided that no member of the 2023 Chengdu Hugo team will be part of our WSFS Division or Hugo team."[11]

On Sunday, February 4, at Capricon 44, McCarty gave a 42-minute interview to Chris Barkley, whose 2023 Best Fan Writer Hugo win may have been affected by the exclusions. It was published on the same day as a recording and a day later as a transcript.[12] While providing some vague explanations including an "SQL error," it just poured oil into the fire.

On the same occasion, Barkley was contacted by Diane Lacey and provided with several of Hugo Subcommitee's internal e-mails from early June[13] and its eligibility spreadsheet. Together with Jason Sanford they published these in an investigative report on Wednesday, February 14. The e-mails made clear that (over a month after the nomination ballots were collected, the time supposedly spent by "canonicalisation", i. e. unifying various possible spellings used for the same nominee) McCarty asked other US fans to "highlight anything of a sensitive political nature" from the Chinese viewpoint and they eagerly complied, based either on the works' contents (often guessed second-hand) or authors' expressions on social media etc. (often misunderstanding facts). It is contented whether or how much the Chengdu part of the concom called for such a process, or at least were informed about it after the fact. (The e-mails also mention explicitly only the Novel, Fan Writer and Astounding categories, so other questions, especially re the Dramatic Presentation above, remain open.)

While Lacey expressed remorse and apologised for her involvement, Kat Jones, who also took part in this vetting although she was not on the subcommittee, published an unrepentant response.[14]

On Thursday, February 15 the Glasgow 2024 Worldcon announced that Jones resigned as its Hugo Administrator "and has been removed from the Glasgow 2024 team across all mediums", and reiterated its previous commitment to transparency of the Hugo process.[15]

Links[edit]

____

  1. 陈石 – on the Chengdu website, press releases etc. sometimes reversed into the Western order as Shi CHEN. This is also the form used on WSFS's Hugo website but without the clarifying capitals for the family name, which can lead to mistaking this for the real name as used commonly. Also uses the nickname Raistlin Chen.
  2. 姜振宇 – or reversed Zhenyu JIANG. Chengdu’s website also suggests Jiang was the other department Co-Head.
  3. 郭东升 – or reversed Dongsheng GUO
  4. 庞博 – or reversed Bo PANG.
  5. Chengdu Worldcon website.
  6. File 770.
  7. Comments at "Chengdu Worldcon Publishes Progress Report", File 770 17 July 2023
  8. “A Smoking Gun,” Cheryl Morgan, January 24, 2024.
  9. File 770.
  10. Mike Glyer's comment of January 30, 2024, at 10:49 pm.
  11. https://facebook.com/Seattle2025/posts/912423250883971?comment_id=1340474623312019 , republished on 5 February (see item 6) by File 770
  12. PDF 400 kB, 13 pages, 6600 words.
  13. PDF at Google Drive, some as screenshots only
  14. https://file770.com/2023-hugo-awards-related-statement-by-kat-jones/
  15. https://glasgow2024.org/chairs-statement-15th-february-2024/

2022 Hugos 2024 2023
This is an award page. If you know something about it, such as who awarded it, who the winners were, what the criteria were, and when it was awarded, please add it! See Standards for Awards.