Difference between revisions of "Queebshots"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Text replacement - "\[\[(19[0-9][0-9])]]" to "$1") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | An [[apazine]] published by [[Norm Clarke]], [[Gina Ellis]], and [[Boyd Raeburn]] starting in | + | An [[apazine]] published by [[Norm Clarke]], [[Gina Ellis]], and [[Boyd Raeburn]] starting in 1963. It ran till 1967 and was known for its acerbic humor. ''Queebshots'' was like a series of [[one shots]], and each issue has its own subtitle. [[Robert Lichtman]], in a letter to ''[[Vegas Fandom Weekly]]'' #97, wrote, "[[Norm Clarke|Norm]] & [[Gina (Ellis) Clark]], two of [[fandom]]'s funniest writers...with [[Boyd Raeburn]] produced a series of "Queebshots" that raised the bar for short, pithy [[oneshots]]". |
At least one issue, "Deep in the Glen", was distributed by [[FAPA]]. | At least one issue, "Deep in the Glen", was distributed by [[FAPA]]. | ||
Revision as of 00:01, 3 January 2020
An apazine published by Norm Clarke, Gina Ellis, and Boyd Raeburn starting in 1963. It ran till 1967 and was known for its acerbic humor. Queebshots was like a series of one shots, and each issue has its own subtitle. Robert Lichtman, in a letter to Vegas Fandom Weekly #97, wrote, "Norm & Gina (Ellis) Clark, two of fandom's funniest writers...with Boyd Raeburn produced a series of "Queebshots" that raised the bar for short, pithy oneshots".
At least one issue, "Deep in the Glen", was distributed by FAPA.
In 1976 Susan Wood published Queebshot, a one shot homage to Queebshots.
| Issue | Date | Pages | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 1963 | 4 | Subtitle: "Blues in the Closet". Produced at the 3rd Western Quebec Science Fiction Convention |
| 6 | May 1964 | 4 | In FAPA 107 |
| 8 | July 1964 | Subtitle: "Terry Carr in Aspic" | |
| 9 | September 1964 | Subtitle: "Duck in the Afternoon" |
| Publication | ???? |
| This is a publication page. Please extend it by adding information about when and by whom it was published, how many issues it has had, (including adding a partial or complete checklist), its contents (including perhaps a ToC listing), its size and repro method, regular columnists, its impact on fandom, or by adding scans or links to scans. See Standards for Publications. |
