Difference between revisions of "Who's Who in Fandom"

From Fancyclopedia 3
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "http:" to "https:")
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Once Upon a Time, it was not risible to think of creating [[fan directory|directories of all active fans]], and many people did.
 
Once Upon a Time, it was not risible to think of creating [[fan directory|directories of all active fans]], and many people did.
  
In 1961 [[Lloyd D. Broyles]] published ''Who's Who in Fandom'', a 40 page booklet. 400 copies were printed.  Entries were alphabetical and included standard background information plus activities in and out of fandom.  
+
[[Ted Dikty]] created ''[[Who's Who in Fandom 1940]]''.
  
There are more than 300 entries, covering [[fans]] famous and unknown (and missing many major [[fans]] of the day.)  The information was collected using a questionnaire circulated through [[fandom]] in 1961.  Besides things like name and address and fanzines published, club memberships, and conventions attended (remember, this was 1961!) it also asked when the [[fan]] started reading [[SF]], and entered [[fandom]].  Oddly, it also asked what speed tape recorders the [[fan]] could use.
+
In 1961, [[Lloyd D. Broyles]] published ''Who's Who in Fandom'', a 40 page booklet. 400 copies were printed.  Entries were alphabetical and included standard background information plus activities in and out of fandom.
 +
 
 +
There are more than 300 entries, covering [[fans]] famous and unknown (and missing many major [[fans]] of the day.)  The information was collected using a questionnaire circulated through [[fandom]] in 1961.  Besides things like name and address and [[fanzines]] published, [[club]] memberships, and [[conventions]] attended (remember, this was 1961!) it also asked when the [[fan]] started reading [[SF]], and entered [[fandom]].  Oddly, it also asked what speed tape recorders the [[fan]] could use.
  
 
[[Lloyd D. Broyles|Broyles]] planned to do a second, larger, and more complete, edition the following year, but was himself [[gafiating]] and it never happened.
 
[[Lloyd D. Broyles|Broyles]] planned to do a second, larger, and more complete, edition the following year, but was himself [[gafiating]] and it never happened.
  
{{publication | year=1961}}
+
[[Ron Bennett]] produced a number of issues of his [[Directory of SF Fandom]].
 +
 
 +
* [https://www.fanac.org/Fannish_Reference_Works/WhosWho/index.html? List of fan directories online] at fanac.org.
 +
 
 +
{{publication}}
 
[[Category:Fanzine]]
 
[[Category:Fanzine]]
 
[[Category:fanhistory]]
 
[[Category:fanhistory]]
 
[[Category:US]]
 
[[Category:US]]

Latest revision as of 09:31, 29 November 2022

Once Upon a Time, it was not risible to think of creating directories of all active fans, and many people did.

Ted Dikty created Who's Who in Fandom 1940.

In 1961, Lloyd D. Broyles published Who's Who in Fandom, a 40 page booklet. 400 copies were printed. Entries were alphabetical and included standard background information plus activities in and out of fandom.

There are more than 300 entries, covering fans famous and unknown (and missing many major fans of the day.) The information was collected using a questionnaire circulated through fandom in 1961. Besides things like name and address and fanzines published, club memberships, and conventions attended (remember, this was 1961!) it also asked when the fan started reading SF, and entered fandom. Oddly, it also asked what speed tape recorders the fan could use.

Broyles planned to do a second, larger, and more complete, edition the following year, but was himself gafiating and it never happened.

Ron Bennett produced a number of issues of his Directory of SF Fandom.


Publication ????
This is a publication page. Please extend it by adding information about when and by whom it was published, how many issues it has had, (including adding a partial or complete checklist), its contents (including perhaps a ToC listing), its size and repro method, regular columnists, its impact on fandom, or by adding scans or links to scans. See Standards for Publications.