Difference between revisions of "Pseudoscience"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{fancy2|text= | {{fancy2|text= | ||
| − | "Scientific" explanations which actually clash with accepted scientific beliefs and findings, but by glossing-over are made to pass for plausibility in the, uh, minds of [[Palmer]]'s readers, [[Scientologists]] and other children. The use of the word to describe [[science-fiction]] in general is fiercely fought by lovers of the literature. | + | "Scientific" explanations which actually clash with accepted scientific beliefs and findings, but by glossing-over are made to pass for plausibility in the, uh, minds of [[Ray Palmer|Palmer]]'s readers, [[Scientologists]] and other children. The use of the word to describe [[science-fiction]] in general is fiercely fought by lovers of the literature. |
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 05:35, 4 October 2023
| From Fancyclopedia 2, ca. 1959 |
| "Scientific" explanations which actually clash with accepted scientific beliefs and findings, but by glossing-over are made to pass for plausibility in the, uh, minds of Palmer's readers, Scientologists and other children. The use of the word to describe science-fiction in general is fiercely fought by lovers of the literature. |
| From Fancyclopedia 1, ca. 1944 |
| Scientific explanations which actually clash with accepted scientific belief, but by glossing-over pass for plausibility to the untutored minds of Fantastic Adventures' audience and other children. The use of the word to describe science-fiction in general is fiercely fought by lovers of the literature. |
See also: Dianetics, Hieronymus Machine, Shaver Mystery.
| Fanspeak |
| This is a fanspeak page. Please extend it by adding information about when and by whom it was coined, whether it’s still in use, etc. |
