Difference between revisions of "FOSFAX"

From Fancyclopedia 3
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "\[\[(19[0-9][0-9])]]" to "$1")
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Officially, ''FOSFAX'' is the [[clubzine]] of [[FOSFA]], the [[Falls of the Ohio Science Fiction and Fantasy Association]], but it has long been mostly an independent [[fanzine]].
+
Officially, ''FOSFAX'' was the [[clubzine]] of [[FOSFA]], the [[Falls of the Ohio Science Fiction and Fantasy Association]], but it became mostly an independent [[fanzine]].
  
 
<tab head=top>
 
<tab head=top>
Years || Editor || Issues || Notes  
+
Issues || Years || Editor || Issues || Notes  
Nov 18, 1973 -- 1979 ||[[Bob Roehm]] ||19 issues ||Nearly all of the issues were in 1973 - 1975  
+
5-31 ||Nov 18, 1973 -- 1979 ||[[Bob Roehm]] || ||Nearly all of the issues were in 1973 - 1975  
June 1979 ||[[Shelby Bush III]] ||20 monthly issues ||Two issues were numbered 32. Last issue was #51.
+
32-51 ||June 1979 ||[[Shelby Bush III]] ||20 monthly issues ||Two issues were numbered 32
Mar 1982 - Jan 1984 ||[[Keith Asay]] ||23 issues, ending with #74 ||  
+
52-74||Mar 1982 - Jan 1984 ||[[Keith Asay]] ||23 issues ||  
Mar-Aug 1984 ||[[Keith Chike]] ||5 one-sheet issues ||Temporary editor - issues were not numbered.  
+
not numbered ||Mar-Aug 1984 ||[[Keith Chike]] ||5 one-sheet issues ||Temporary editor - issues were not numbered.  
Summer 1984 ||[[Bruce Gardner]] ||26 monthly issues ||Issues were again numbered starting at issue #95  
+
95-||Summer 1984 ||[[Bruce Gardner]] ||26 monthly issues ||Issues were again numbered starting at issue #95  
||[[Joseph Major]] ||4 issues ||[[joseph major|Major]] was "first among equals" of editorial committee.  
+
||[[Joseph Major]] || ||4 issues ||Major was "first among equals" of editorial committee.  
Jan 1987 ||[[Timothy Lane]] || ||Under [[timothy lane|Lane's]] editorship, ''FOSFAX'' has grown to a 70- to 100-page bi-monthly [[fanzine]]  
+
||Jan 1987 ||[[Timothy Lane]] || ||Under Lane's editorship, ''FOSFAX'' grew to a 70- to 100-page bi-monthly [[fanzine]], known for its long [[lettercol]] and fervent discussions of Lane’s right wing [[mundane]] [[politics]].
Oct 1988 ||[[Timothy Lane]] and [[Janice L. Moore]] || ||Starting with issue #132
+
132-||Oct 1988 ||[[Timothy Lane]] and [[Janice L. Moore]] || ||
Jan 1993 ||[[Timothy Lane]] and [[Elizabeth Garrott]] || ||Starting with issue #163
+
163-||Jan 1993 ||[[Timothy Lane]] and [[Elizabeth Garrott]] || ||
 
</tab>
 
</tab>
  
Line 18: Line 18:
 
* Reviewed by [[Mike Glyer]] in {{file770 | issue=65 | page=13}}
 
* Reviewed by [[Mike Glyer]] in {{file770 | issue=65 | page=13}}
  
{{publication}}
+
{{publication | start=1973}}
 
[[Category:clubzine]]
 
[[Category:clubzine]]
 
[[Category:fanzine]]
 
[[Category:fanzine]]
 
[[Category:US]]
 
[[Category:US]]

Latest revision as of 07:08, 9 October 2020

Officially, FOSFAX was the clubzine of FOSFA, the Falls of the Ohio Science Fiction and Fantasy Association, but it became mostly an independent fanzine.

Issues Years Editor Issues Notes
5-31 Nov 18, 1973 -- 1979 Bob Roehm Nearly all of the issues were in 1973 - 1975
32-51 June 1979 Shelby Bush III 20 monthly issues Two issues were numbered 32
52-74 Mar 1982 - Jan 1984 Keith Asay 23 issues
not numbered Mar-Aug 1984 Keith Chike 5 one-sheet issues Temporary editor - issues were not numbered.
95- Summer 1984 Bruce Gardner 26 monthly issues Issues were again numbered starting at issue #95
Joseph Major 4 issues Major was "first among equals" of editorial committee.
Jan 1987 Timothy Lane Under Lane's editorship, FOSFAX grew to a 70- to 100-page bi-monthly fanzine, known for its long lettercol and fervent discussions of Lane’s right wing mundane politics.
132- Oct 1988 Timothy Lane and Janice L. Moore
163- Jan 1993 Timothy Lane and Elizabeth Garrott

FOSFAX was nominated for the Best Fanzine Hugo seven times, in 1988-1993 and 1996.


Publication 1973
This is a publication page. Please extend it by adding information about when and by whom it was published, how many issues it has had, (including adding a partial or complete checklist), its contents (including perhaps a ToC listing), its size and repro method, regular columnists, its impact on fandom, or by adding scans or links to scans. See Standards for Publications.