Difference between revisions of "Rackhamart"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Mark Plummer (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | '''''Rackhamart''''' was a 10-page, [[one-shot]] [[apazine]] published by [[Daphne Buckmaster]] in the [[UK]] and featuring, as the title implies, [[art]]work by [[John Rackham]]. It was [[post-mailing|postmailed]] to [[OMPA]] mailing 31 in Spring 1962 and was Buckmaster's final contribution after eight years of membership. | |
| + | |||
| + | In an introduction, Rackham says: | ||
| + | |||
| + | I have long been depressed by the majority of so-called [[art|art-work]] put out by those who [[stencil]] and [[duplicate]] as a hobby. There are, of course, honourable exceptions, and some of the mechanical drawing I have seen is quite good but, on the whole, stencil 'art' strikes me as lacking in imagination and inventiveness ... Accordingly, as soon as the time and opportunity came together, I decided to try some experiments. | ||
{{publication | year=1962}} | {{publication | year=1962}} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:12, 30 June 2024
Rackhamart was a 10-page, one-shot apazine published by Daphne Buckmaster in the UK and featuring, as the title implies, artwork by John Rackham. It was postmailed to OMPA mailing 31 in Spring 1962 and was Buckmaster's final contribution after eight years of membership.
In an introduction, Rackham says:
I have long been depressed by the majority of so-called art-work put out by those who stencil and duplicate as a hobby. There are, of course, honourable exceptions, and some of the mechanical drawing I have seen is quite good but, on the whole, stencil 'art' strikes me as lacking in imagination and inventiveness ... Accordingly, as soon as the time and opportunity came together, I decided to try some experiments.
| Publication | 1962 |
| This is a publication page. Please extend it by adding information about when and by whom it was published, how many issues it has had, (including adding a partial or complete checklist), its contents (including perhaps a ToC listing), its size and repro method, regular columnists, its impact on fandom, or by adding scans or links to scans. See Standards for Publications. |
