Difference between revisions of "Ron Bennett Appreciation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
Mark Plummer (talk | contribs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | '''''Ron Bennett Appreciation''''' (some sources give the title as '''''The Ron Bennett Appreciation Issue''''') was a [[one-off]] [[apazine]] (appreciating [[Ron Bennett]]!) by [[John Berry]] and [[ATom]] published in February 1958 for [[OMPA]] mailing #15. | |
| − | {{publication}} | + | In ''[[Cry of the Nameless]]'' #114 (April 1958), [[Amelia Pemberton]] reviewed it, saying |
| + | |||
| + | Ron Bennett has a wife named Joan and an elephant named [[Cecil]]; and one, both or neither is real (or fictitious, if you prefer to look at it that way). I strongly suspect that the wife is real & the elephant fictitious, as men usually have wives & seldom have elephants. I am aware that this is mundane reasoning, and am heartily ashamed of it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{publication|year=1958}} | ||
[[Category:apazine]] | [[Category:apazine]] | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:fanzine]] |
| + | [[Category:UK]] | ||
Latest revision as of 08:49, 19 December 2024
Ron Bennett Appreciation (some sources give the title as The Ron Bennett Appreciation Issue) was a one-off apazine (appreciating Ron Bennett!) by John Berry and ATom published in February 1958 for OMPA mailing #15.
In Cry of the Nameless #114 (April 1958), Amelia Pemberton reviewed it, saying
Ron Bennett has a wife named Joan and an elephant named Cecil; and one, both or neither is real (or fictitious, if you prefer to look at it that way). I strongly suspect that the wife is real & the elephant fictitious, as men usually have wives & seldom have elephants. I am aware that this is mundane reasoning, and am heartily ashamed of it.
| Publication | 1958 |
| This is a publication page. Please extend it by adding information about when and by whom it was published, how many issues it has had, (including adding a partial or complete checklist), its contents (including perhaps a ToC listing), its size and repro method, regular columnists, its impact on fandom, or by adding scans or links to scans. See Standards for Publications. |
