Difference between revisions of "Ron Bennett Appreciation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Mark Plummer (talk | contribs) |
Mark Plummer (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
In ''[[Cry of the Nameless]]'' #114 (April 1958), [[Amelia Pemberton]] reviewed it, saying | In ''[[Cry of the Nameless]]'' #114 (April 1958), [[Amelia Pemberton]] reviewed it, saying | ||
− | Ron Bennett has a wife named Joan and an elephant named [[Cecil]]; and one, both or neither is real (or fictitious, if you prefer to look at it that way). I strongly suspect that the wife is real & the elephant fictitious, as men usually have wives & seldom have elephants | + | Ron Bennett has a wife named Joan and an elephant named [[Cecil]]; and one, both or neither is real (or fictitious, if you prefer to look at it that way). I strongly suspect that the wife is real & the elephant fictitious, as men usually have wives & seldom have elephants. I am aware that this is mundane reasoning, and am heartily ashamed of it. |
{{publication|year=1958}} | {{publication|year=1958}} |
Latest revision as of 08:49, 19 December 2024
Ron Bennett Appreciation (some sources give the title as The Ron Bennett Appreciation Issue) was a one-off apazine (appreciating Ron Bennett!) by John Berry and ATom published in February 1958 for OMPA mailing #15.
In Cry of the Nameless #114 (April 1958), Amelia Pemberton reviewed it, saying
Ron Bennett has a wife named Joan and an elephant named Cecil; and one, both or neither is real (or fictitious, if you prefer to look at it that way). I strongly suspect that the wife is real & the elephant fictitious, as men usually have wives & seldom have elephants. I am aware that this is mundane reasoning, and am heartily ashamed of it.
Publication | 1958 |
This is a publication page. Please extend it by adding information about when and by whom it was published, how many issues it has had, (including adding a partial or complete checklist), its contents (including perhaps a ToC listing), its size and repro method, regular columnists, its impact on fandom, or by adding scans or links to scans. See Standards for Publications. |