Difference between revisions of "Aristocrat of Science Fiction"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{fancy2|text= | {{fancy2|text= | ||
− | ([[Palmer]]) A glance at the entry under "[[Palmerism]]" will explain the hilarity which followed [[RAP]]'s application of this tag to [[Amazing Stories]], and the reason why it's quoted solely in sarcastic connections. | + | ([[Palmer]]) A glance at the entry under "[[Palmerism]]" will explain the hilarity which followed [[RAP]]'s application of this tag to [[Amazing Stories]], and the reason why it's quoted solely in sarcastic connections. }} |
− | + | {{Fancy2S|text= The credit should be ([[T. O'Connor Sloane]]). [[Amazing|Amz]] was tagged with this long before [[Ziff-Davis|ZDays]]; it was the degradation under [[Palmer]] that made the label ludicrous. And [[Galaxy]] and [[F&SF]] have applied the term to themselves, claiming that ''Life'' called them that in an article on [[fandom]] and [[stf]]. | |
− | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 16:18, 28 October 2021
From Fancyclopedia 2, ca. 1959 |
(Palmer) A glance at the entry under "Palmerism" will explain the hilarity which followed RAP's application of this tag to Amazing Stories, and the reason why it's quoted solely in sarcastic connections. |
From Fancyclopedia 2 Supplement, ca. 1960 |
The credit should be (T. O'Connor Sloane). Amz was tagged with this long before ZDays; it was the degradation under Palmer that made the label ludicrous. And Galaxy and F&SF have applied the term to themselves, claiming that Life called them that in an article on fandom and stf. |
Fanspeak |
This is a fanspeak page. Please extend it by adding information about when and by whom it was coined, whether it’s still in use, etc. |