Difference between revisions of "The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | (Did you mean [[Donald Tuck]]’s [[Encyclopedia of Science Fiction and Fantasy]]?) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
'''''The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction''''' is an English language reference work on [[SF]], first published in 1979. The second edition appeared in 1993, followed by an expanded CD-ROM in 1995. In October 2011, the third edition was made available for [http://www.sf-encyclopedia.com free online]. | '''''The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction''''' is an English language reference work on [[SF]], first published in 1979. The second edition appeared in 1993, followed by an expanded CD-ROM in 1995. In October 2011, the third edition was made available for [http://www.sf-encyclopedia.com free online]. | ||
Line 8: | Line 11: | ||
* [[2012 Best Related Work Hugo]] | * [[2012 Best Related Work Hugo]] | ||
+ | [http://www.sf-encyclopedia.com Online edition.] | ||
− | {{publication | + | {{publication | start=1979 }} |
[[Category:website]] | [[Category:website]] | ||
[[Category:book]] | [[Category:book]] | ||
[[Category:UK]] | [[Category:UK]] |
Revision as of 12:22, 14 February 2021
(Did you mean Donald Tuck’s Encyclopedia of Science Fiction and Fantasy?)
The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction is an English language reference work on SF, first published in 1979. The second edition appeared in 1993, followed by an expanded CD-ROM in 1995. In October 2011, the third edition was made available for free online.
The editors for the first two editions were John Clute (billed as Associate Editor in 1979) and Peter Nicholls (billed as General Editor in 1979). The principal editors for the third edition are Clute and Dave Langford, with Nicholls now billed as Editor Emeritus and Graham Sleight as Managing Editor.
In an unmatched performance, all three editions won the Hugo:
Publication | 1979— |
This is a publication page. Please extend it by adding information about when and by whom it was published, how many issues it has had, (including adding a partial or complete checklist), its contents (including perhaps a ToC listing), its size and repro method, regular columnists, its impact on fandom, or by adding scans or links to scans. See Standards for Publications. |