Difference between revisions of "Redd's Compromise"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
During the debates over how the site of the [[Worldcon]] should be chosen, [[Redd Boggs]] proposed a compromise between the [[N3F]] deciding the site and the present method of it being selected by the members of the current [[Worldcon]]. He proposed that the [[N3F]] poll both members and non-members to decide the site. The motion failed. | During the debates over how the site of the [[Worldcon]] should be chosen, [[Redd Boggs]] proposed a compromise between the [[N3F]] deciding the site and the present method of it being selected by the members of the current [[Worldcon]]. He proposed that the [[N3F]] poll both members and non-members to decide the site. The motion failed. | ||
− | {{ | + | {{fanhistory}} |
− | |||
− |
Latest revision as of 16:59, 9 September 2020
During the debates over how the site of the Worldcon should be chosen, Redd Boggs proposed a compromise between the N3F deciding the site and the present method of it being selected by the members of the current Worldcon. He proposed that the N3F poll both members and non-members to decide the site. The motion failed.
Fanhistory |
This is a fanhistory page. Please add more detail. |