Difference between revisions of "Eofan"

From Fancyclopedia 3
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Jack Speer]] became one of [[fandom]]'s earliest historians, introducing his concept of [[Numbered Fandoms]] (which see), initially covering [[First Fandom]], [[Second Fandom]] and [[Third Fandom]]. The [[microcosm]] being as young as it was, some of these "eras" lasted only a few years. Every [[numbered fandom]] has its own [[Focal Point]] (for all that many of these were determined retroactively, since the concept of the focal point was not originally part of it) and a slightly different slant regarding [[fandom]]'s "purpose". But fairly early on, [[Speer]] discovered he hadn't started his history of the [[microcosm]] early enough...so, on revising his original, he dubbed this earlier period "eofandom" and the [[fans]] who were active there became "eofans". Its usage makes it possible to write a sentence which makes perfect sense when read but seems like nonsense when spoken aloud: "An eofan can never be a [[neofan]]."
+
An '''eofan''' is somebody who was doing [[fanac]] and making inroads toward [[fandom]] before fandom really existed.
 +
 
 +
[[Jack Speer]] became one of [[fandom]]'s earliest historians, introducing his concept of [[Numerical Fandoms]] (which see), initially covering [[First Fandom]], [[Second Fandom]] and [[Third Fandom]].  
 +
 
 +
Fairly early on, [[Speer]] was told he hadn't started his history of the [[microcosm]] early enough ... so, on revising his original, he dubbed this earlier period "eofandom" and the [[fans]] who were active there became "eofans". Its usage makes it possible to write a sentence which makes perfect sense when read but seems like nonsense when spoken aloud: "An eofan can never be a [[neofan]]."
 +
 
 +
One of Speer’s critics was [[Don Wollheim]], who said [[fandom]] started crawling out of its primeval ooze in 1929 in [http://fanac.org/fanzines/Fan_Slants/fans3.pdf#page=5 his view of its origins], published in ''[[Fan Slants]]'' 3 (June 1944).
  
 
{{fanspeak}}
 
{{fanspeak}}
 
[[Category:Fanhistory]]
 
[[Category:Fanhistory]]

Revision as of 04:38, 6 September 2020

An eofan is somebody who was doing fanac and making inroads toward fandom before fandom really existed.

Jack Speer became one of fandom's earliest historians, introducing his concept of Numerical Fandoms (which see), initially covering First Fandom, Second Fandom and Third Fandom.

Fairly early on, Speer was told he hadn't started his history of the microcosm early enough ... so, on revising his original, he dubbed this earlier period "eofandom" and the fans who were active there became "eofans". Its usage makes it possible to write a sentence which makes perfect sense when read but seems like nonsense when spoken aloud: "An eofan can never be a neofan."

One of Speer’s critics was Don Wollheim, who said fandom started crawling out of its primeval ooze in 1929 in his view of its origins, published in Fan Slants 3 (June 1944).


Fanspeak
This is a fanspeak page. Please extend it by adding information about when and by whom it was coined, whether it’s still in use, etc.