Difference between revisions of "Talk:1960 Hugos"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(replying to self; this seems mistakenly ante-dated to apparently the affair has been mistakenly ante-dated to the 1959 Hugos, will remove the para from there ASAP) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | I'd love to know who confirmed it! --[[User:Mlo|-- mlo (talk)]] ([[User talk:Mlo|talk]]) 10:55, 3 April 2022 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
Mark (or anyone else in the know), could you add the source of "later identified as ", so such a thing is available all in one place? Thanks --[[User:JVjr|JVjr]] ([[User talk:JVjr|talk]]) 12:45, 2 April 2022 (PDT) | Mark (or anyone else in the know), could you add the source of "later identified as ", so such a thing is available all in one place? Thanks --[[User:JVjr|JVjr]] ([[User talk:JVjr|talk]]) 12:45, 2 April 2022 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 10:55, 3 April 2022
I'd love to know who confirmed it! ---- mlo (talk) (talk) 10:55, 3 April 2022 (PDT)
Mark (or anyone else in the know), could you add the source of "later identified as ", so such a thing is available all in one place? Thanks --JVjr (talk) 12:45, 2 April 2022 (PDT)
So I see it has been mentiooned in Rob Hansen's https://ansible.uk/Then/then_3-1.html , quoting Vector 10 (where however the nominee was not naned). --JVjr (talk) 12:45, 2 April 2022 (PDT)
Also, apparently the affair has been mistakenly ante-dated to the 1959 Hugos here. Will remove the relevant paragraph from there when I have the time. --JVjr (talk) 12:45, 2 April 2022 (PDT)
