Difference between revisions of "Rataplan"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
8 || 1972 || || | 8 || 1972 || || | ||
9 || 1972 || || | 9 || 1972 || || | ||
− | 10 || 1972 || | + | 10 || 1972 || 24 || |
− | 11 || 1973 ||23 || for FAPA | + | 11 || 1973 || 23 || for FAPA |
12 || September 1973 || 22 || | 12 || September 1973 || 22 || | ||
− | 13 || December | + | 13 || December 1973 || 20 || FAPA |
14 || 1974 || 20 || | 14 || 1974 || 20 || | ||
15 || April 1974 || 20 || FAPA | 15 || April 1974 || 20 || FAPA | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
</tab> | </tab> | ||
− | {{fanzineindex}} | + | * {{fanzineindex}} |
{{publication|start=1968|end=1985}} | {{publication|start=1968|end=1985}} |
Revision as of 20:00, 17 December 2021
An apazine published by Leigh Edmonds which was included in APA-45 and FAPA. Diane Bangsund and Valma Brown were at times co-editors.
It was nominated for a Ditmar Award for Best Fanzine in 1969 and 1973, and won in 1984 (shared with Ornithopter).
Issue | Date | Pages | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
1 | August 1968 | 40 | Diane Bangsund was co-editor |
2 | 1968 | 24 | Diane Bangsund and Bernie Bernhouse were co-editors |
3 | 1969 | 24 | " |
4 | |||
5 | March 1970 | 26 | |
6 | |||
7 | |||
8 | 1972 | ||
9 | 1972 | ||
10 | 1972 | 24 | |
11 | 1973 | 23 | for FAPA |
12 | September 1973 | 22 | |
13 | December 1973 | 20 | FAPA |
14 | 1974 | 20 | |
15 | April 1974 | 20 | FAPA |
16 | May 1974 | 18 | FAPA |
17-18 | 1975 | 48 | Double issue; FAPA |
19-20 | January 1978 | 58 | Double issue; Valma Brown was co-editor |
21 | February 1983 | 36 | |
22 | April 1983 | 36 | for SAPS |
23 | June 1983 | 36 | " |
24 | August 1983 | 36 | " |
25 | October 1983 | 18 | " |
26 | December 1983 | 36 | " |
27 | February 1984 | 28 | " |
28 | April 1984 | 42 | " |
29 | June 1984 | 44 | " |
30 | August 1984 | 28 | " |
31 | August 1985 | 52 | Final issue |
- Rataplan online at fanac.org
Publication | 1968—1985 |
This is a publication page. Please extend it by adding information about when and by whom it was published, how many issues it has had, (including adding a partial or complete checklist), its contents (including perhaps a ToC listing), its size and repro method, regular columnists, its impact on fandom, or by adding scans or links to scans. See Standards for Publications. |