Difference between revisions of "Extrapolation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{fancy2|text= | {{fancy2|text= | ||
| − | ([[DeCamp]]) Prediction from present knowledge and trends, or speculation based thereon, as distinguished from mere guessing; but always keeping the imagination consistent with the knowledge that one started from. This, of course, is just what we have in science-fiction. There are few really impressive examples; [[Verne]] is very weak (about like a modern predicting a landing on the moon shortly). [You people who are reading this at Tycho Station, kindly remember that we write in mid-1959.] The [[Cleve Cartmill|bomb story]] that got [[ASF]] raided was on a par with this; there'd been free speculation in [[prozines]] (and even comic books) about the explosive virtues of | + | ([[DeCamp]]) Prediction from present knowledge and trends, or speculation based thereon, as distinguished from mere guessing; but always keeping the [[imagination]] consistent with the knowledge that one started from. This, of course, is just what we have in [[science-fiction]]. There are few really impressive examples; [[Verne]] is very weak (about like a modern predicting a landing on the moon shortly). [You people who are reading this at Tycho Station, kindly remember that we write in mid-1959.] The [[Cleve Cartmill|bomb story]] that got [[ASF]] raided was on a par with this; there'd been free speculation in [[prozines]] (and even [[comic books]]) about the explosive virtues of [[U]]<sup>235</sup>. Perhaps the Future Histories of [[Heinlein]] and [[Poul Anderson]] may be considered examples of extrapolation. |
}} | }} | ||
{{fancy1|text= | {{fancy1|text= | ||
| − | The writer doesn't find this in his Winston dictionary, but it's a frequent word among [[scientifictionists]]. It means to take known data or principles and speculate beyond them, but always keeping the imagination consonant with the knowledge that one started from; this of course is just what is done in [[science-fiction]]. | + | The writer doesn't find this in his Winston dictionary, but it's a frequent word among [[scientifictionists]]. It means to take known data or principles and speculate beyond them, but always keeping the [[imagination]] consonant with the knowledge that one started from; this of course is just what is done in [[science-fiction]]. |
}} | }} | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{fanspeak}} |
[[Category:fancy1]] | [[Category:fancy1]] | ||
[[Category:fancy2]] | [[Category:fancy2]] | ||
Revision as of 03:46, 8 August 2022
(Did you mean a Tom Clareson fanzine?)
| From Fancyclopedia 2, ca. 1959 |
| (DeCamp) Prediction from present knowledge and trends, or speculation based thereon, as distinguished from mere guessing; but always keeping the imagination consistent with the knowledge that one started from. This, of course, is just what we have in science-fiction. There are few really impressive examples; Verne is very weak (about like a modern predicting a landing on the moon shortly). [You people who are reading this at Tycho Station, kindly remember that we write in mid-1959.] The bomb story that got ASF raided was on a par with this; there'd been free speculation in prozines (and even comic books) about the explosive virtues of U235. Perhaps the Future Histories of Heinlein and Poul Anderson may be considered examples of extrapolation. |
| From Fancyclopedia 1, ca. 1944 |
| The writer doesn't find this in his Winston dictionary, but it's a frequent word among scientifictionists. It means to take known data or principles and speculate beyond them, but always keeping the imagination consonant with the knowledge that one started from; this of course is just what is done in science-fiction. |
| Fanspeak |
| This is a fanspeak page. Please extend it by adding information about when and by whom it was coined, whether it’s still in use, etc. |
