Difference between revisions of "Vert"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
Mark Plummer (talk | contribs) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | (Did you mean [[Vert (Gaier | + | ''(Did you mean [[Vert (Gaier)|Gil Gaier fanzine]]?)'' |
| − | + | '''''Vert''''' was an [[apazine]] published for [[OMPA]] by [[Ivor Mayne]] in the [[UK]]. | |
| + | |||
| + | In ''[[Scottishe]]'' #23 (March 1961), [[Ethel Lindsay]] said, presumably in comment on #2: | ||
| + | You criticise well, so do keep it up, I know it takes time, but Ompa has few people who are able to do so. ... Your history of the Beats was fairly interesting, would have been more so had you included some of your personal opinions on the subject. This is a quite good [[Letter Substitute|letter substitute]] but is only so-so as an Ompazine. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Archie Mercer]] in ''[[Amble]]'' #6 (June 1961) said of #3: | ||
| + | Much of your zine consists of reviews of books and films that I've never read or seen and an never likely to, and therefore of academic interest (though they DO interest) only. I prefer the bits where you come right out and get personal. | ||
<tab head=top> | <tab head=top> | ||
| − | Issue || Date || Pages || Notes | + | Issue || Date || Pages || [[OMPA]] mailing || Notes |
| − | 1 ||June 1960 ||22 || | + | 1 || June 1960 || 22 || 24 || |
| − | 2 ||1960 ||12 || | + | 2 || December 1960 || 12 || 26 || |
| − | 3 ||March 1961 ||18 || | + | 3 || March 1961 || 18 || 27 || |
</tab> | </tab> | ||
| − | {{publication | start=1960 | end=1961}} | + | {{publication | start=1960 | end=1961|locale=London, UK}} |
| − | |||
[[Category:apazine]] | [[Category:apazine]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Fanzine]] | ||
[[Category:UK]] | [[Category:UK]] | ||
Latest revision as of 02:38, 9 January 2025
(Did you mean Gil Gaier fanzine?)
Vert was an apazine published for OMPA by Ivor Mayne in the UK.
In Scottishe #23 (March 1961), Ethel Lindsay said, presumably in comment on #2:
You criticise well, so do keep it up, I know it takes time, but Ompa has few people who are able to do so. ... Your history of the Beats was fairly interesting, would have been more so had you included some of your personal opinions on the subject. This is a quite good letter substitute but is only so-so as an Ompazine.
Archie Mercer in Amble #6 (June 1961) said of #3:
Much of your zine consists of reviews of books and films that I've never read or seen and an never likely to, and therefore of academic interest (though they DO interest) only. I prefer the bits where you come right out and get personal.
| Issue | Date | Pages | OMPA mailing | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | June 1960 | 22 | 24 | |
| 2 | December 1960 | 12 | 26 | |
| 3 | March 1961 | 18 | 27 |
| Publication | 1960—1961 |
| This is a publication page. Please extend it by adding information about when and by whom it was published, how many issues it has had, (including adding a partial or complete checklist), its contents (including perhaps a ToC listing), its size and repro method, regular columnists, its impact on fandom, or by adding scans or links to scans. See Standards for Publications. |
