Difference between revisions of "Redd's Compromise"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
During the debates over how the site of the [[Worldcon]] should be chosen, [[Redd Boggs]] proposed a compromise between the [[N3F]] deciding the site and the present method of it being selected by the members of the current [[Worldcon]]. He proposed that the [[N3F]] poll both members and non-members to decide the site. The motion failed. | During the debates over how the site of the [[Worldcon]] should be chosen, [[Redd Boggs]] proposed a compromise between the [[N3F]] deciding the site and the present method of it being selected by the members of the current [[Worldcon]]. He proposed that the [[N3F]] poll both members and non-members to decide the site. The motion failed. | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{conrunning}} |
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 14:14, 8 December 2019
During the debates over how the site of the Worldcon should be chosen, Redd Boggs proposed a compromise between the N3F deciding the site and the present method of it being selected by the members of the current Worldcon. He proposed that the N3F poll both members and non-members to decide the site. The motion failed.
| Conrunning |
| This is a conrunning page. |
