2005 NASFiC Site Selection
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Site Selection for the 2005 NASFiC was conducted by Torcon 3, the 2003 Worldcon in Toronto, Canada. After 3 rounds in a very tight race, Seattle in 2005 was selected to run CascadiaCon.
First Round | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bid | Mail-In | Thur | Fri | Sat | Total |
Charlotte in 2005 | 33 | 17 | 49 | 88 | 187 |
Seattle in 2005 | 34 | 21 | 46 | 90 | 191 |
Minneapolis | 2 | 2 | |||
Both | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | |
Monkey's Eyebrow | 1 | 1 | |||
None of the Above | 3 | 9 | 4 | 16 | 32 |
Total With Preference | 72 | 48 | 99 | 198 | 417 |
* Needed to Win | 209 | ||||
No Preference | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
Total Valid Ballots | 74 | 49 | 101 | 200 | 424 |
Second Round | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bid | Mail-In | Chg | Thur | Chg | Fri | Chg | Sat | Total | Chg |
Charlotte in 2005 | 34 | +1 | 17 | 49 | 88 | 188 | 1 | ||
Seattle in 2005 | 35 | +1 | 21 | 46 | 92 | 194 | 3 | ||
Minneapolis | (2) | ||||||||
Both | (1) | (1) | (4) | ||||||
Monkey's Eyebrow | (1) | (1) | |||||||
None of the Above | 3 | 9 | 4 | 18 | 34 | 2 | |||
Total With Preference | 72 | 47 | (1) | 99 | 198 | 416 | (1) | ||
* Needed to Win | 209 | ||||||||
No Preference | 2 | 2 | +1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | +1 | ||
Total Valid Ballots | 74 | 49 | 101 | 200 | 424 |
Third Round | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bid | Mail-In | Chg | Thur | Chg | Fri | Chg | Sat | Chg | Total | Chg |
Charlotte in 2005 | 34 | 19 | +2 | 49 | 96 | +8 | 198 | +10 | ||
Seattle in 2005 | 37 | +2 | 24 | +3 | 46 | 97 | +5 | 204 | +10 | |
Minneapolis | ||||||||||
Both | ||||||||||
Monkey's Eyebrow | ||||||||||
None of the Above | (3) | (9) | (4) | (18) | (34) | |||||
Total With Preference | 71 | (1) | 43 | (4) | 95 | (4) | 193 | (5) | 402 | (14) |
* Needed to Win | 202 | |||||||||
No Preference | 3 | +1 | 6 | +4 | 6 | +4 | 7 | +5 | 22 | +14 |
Total Valid Ballots | 74 | 49 | 101 | 200 | 424 |
1999 | NASFiC Site Selection | 2007 | 2005 |
This is page about convention bidding, the competition and its outcome. Please extend it by adding information about who was bidding, and how the race went. |