Justification

From Fancyclopedia 3
Revision as of 13:46, 1 December 2019 by John (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated import of articles)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
From Fancyclopedia 2, ca. 1959
The process of putting even right-hand edges on typewritten matter in a fanzine. The second paragraph below is justified, at least in this sense. Iconoclasts like Laney and puristical users of real printing like Bill Danner object to the idea on the ground that typewriter typeface just doesn't look like letterpress and trying to use it to imitate the latter is Vulgar Ostentation.

Ecco la: The usual method is to write up what you want to say, in the spacing you plan to use -- i.e. make a dummy copy -- and, reaching the end of a line, fill in the space between the end of the written line and the edge of your printing area with some mark that won't be mistaken for text. This indicates how many spaces you must skip, when cutting the stencil, to get even right-hand margins. But it's a lot of work and adds little to the appearance of a magazine as compared to other factors such as good stencil-cutting and even inking, so many fans refuse to fool with it.

== The usual method is to write up what you want to say, inXXX the spacing you plan to use -- i.e. make a dummy copy --XXX and, reaching the end of a line, fill in the space betweenXXXX the end of the written line and the edge of your printingXXXX area with some mark that won't be mistaken for text. ThisXX indicates how many spaces you must skip, when cuttingXXX the stencil, to get even right-hand margins. ButXXXXXXXXXX it's a lot of work and adds little to the appearance of a magazine as compared to other factors such as good stencil-cuttingXXX and even inking, so many fans refuse to fool with it. /==

Metacomment: The paragraph above, however, was set with the "text-align=justify" html style. Damn, our tools are easy to use these days. --Jim Caughran