Difference between revisions of "VoMaidens"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Vom]] took to publishing [[fans]]' drawings of nudes, sometimes with fantastic background to excuse their appearing in a [[fantasy]] [[fan magazine]]. [[Ackerman]], however, justified it on broader grounds: that [[fanzines]] should publish whatever fans want, and especially something like this that couldn't be published in general magazines because of silly rules. The VoMaidens are criticized mainly for lack of artistic merit; only a minority disapproved for reasons of morality. | [[Vom]] took to publishing [[fans]]' drawings of nudes, sometimes with fantastic background to excuse their appearing in a [[fantasy]] [[fan magazine]]. [[Ackerman]], however, justified it on broader grounds: that [[fanzines]] should publish whatever fans want, and especially something like this that couldn't be published in general magazines because of silly rules. The VoMaidens are criticized mainly for lack of artistic merit; only a minority disapproved for reasons of morality. | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | See also: [[Rotsler Wenches, Babes or Nudes]] | ||
{{misc}} | {{misc}} | ||
[[Category:fancy1]] | [[Category:fancy1]] | ||
Revision as of 01:17, 7 September 2020
| From Fancyclopedia 1, ca. 1944 |
| Vom took to publishing fans' drawings of nudes, sometimes with fantastic background to excuse their appearing in a fantasy fan magazine. Ackerman, however, justified it on broader grounds: that fanzines should publish whatever fans want, and especially something like this that couldn't be published in general magazines because of silly rules. The VoMaidens are criticized mainly for lack of artistic merit; only a minority disapproved for reasons of morality. |
See also: Rotsler Wenches, Babes or Nudes
| Miscellaneous |
| This is a miscellaneous page |
