Difference between revisions of "Ktp"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | (Did you mean a [[Ktp (Lichtman)|Robert Lichtman fanzine]]?) | |
+ | |||
+ | Esperanto for Etc | ||
+ | |||
{{fancy2|text= | {{fancy2|text= | ||
([[Speer]]) Kaj tiel plu; [[Esperanto]] and so forth, equivalent to Latin etc and Deutsche usw. | ([[Speer]]) Kaj tiel plu; [[Esperanto]] and so forth, equivalent to Latin etc and Deutsche usw. | ||
Line 7: | Line 10: | ||
}} | }} | ||
− | + | {{misc}} | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | {{ | ||
− | |||
[[Category:fancy2]] | [[Category:fancy2]] | ||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 03:46, 10 March 2020
(Did you mean a Robert Lichtman fanzine?)
Esperanto for Etc
From Fancyclopedia 2, ca. 1959 |
(Speer) Kaj tiel plu; Esperanto and so forth, equivalent to Latin etc and Deutsche usw.
from Fancyclopedia 2 Supplement ca. 1960: 'Twas the Esparantist Ackerman, not Speer, who introduced this. The reason for having all these variations on and-so-forth is that fen, steeped in null-a thinking, realizing that most listings are incomplete perforce, and would tend to overuse etc were there no substitutes for it. Incidentally, Korzybski also used ., and ,. as devices of similar meaning. |
Miscellaneous |
This is a miscellaneous page |