JD-Argassy

From Fancyclopedia 3
(Redirected from JD)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

An irregular fanzine devoted to the pulps and edited by Lynn Hickman. It was 8½ X 11 inches, and stapled. There were at least 60 issues and many were distributed through OMPA. A pulp collectors' site calls it "a nice resource for the serious collector."

It was nominated for the 1959 Best Fanzine Hugo and the 1960 Best Fanzine Hugo.

Its history is a bit complicated, being the merger of JD and Argassy, the latter an allusion to Argosy magazine.

Variant titles: J. D Argassy, JD-A {What does the title mean?}

Issue Date Pages OMPA Mailing Notes
Initially titled JD
22 October 1955 30
23 1956 18
24 August 1956 22
27 1958 18
30 1958 12 16
31 1958 20 17
32 – 38 Not Published
JD combines with Argassy -- new title is JD-Argassy
39 November 1958 6 19
40 December 1958 26 19
41 January 1959 10 19
42 March 1959 12 19
44 May 1959 30 20
45 June 1959 12 20
46 June 1959 12 20
47 July 1959 28 20 Terry Carr review in Fanac 42 (August 18, 1959, p. 3): “continues Bob Madle’s Loncon report, Dan Adkins’ fanzine reviews, and Jim Harmon’s series of prophiles on fans he has met. This one’s on Redd Boggs, and is fairly amusing, just like the rest of the issue. The art by George Barr is the most impressive thing about this issue.”
48 August 1959 16 21
49 September 1959 22 21 Includes Detention convention reports
50 November 1959 4 21
51 December 1959 26 22
52 January 1960 22 23
53 February 1960 12 23
54 April 1960 28 24
55 June 1960 76
56 May 1960 29
57 May 1961 26
58 October 1961 28
59 March 1962 44
60 Winter 1963 36
Now titled The Pulp Era
61 July 1964 28
62 December 1965 32
63 May 1966 58
64 August 1966 44
65 October 1966 30
66 April 1967 66
67 June 1967 130
68 December 1967 36
69 February 1968 32
70 30
71 April 1969 26
72 September 1969 22
73 December 1969 36
74 Spring 1970 32
75 Spring 1971 34
New series
1 October 1993 46



Publication ????
This is a publication page. Please extend it by adding information about when and by whom it was published, how many issues it has had, (including adding a partial or complete checklist), its contents (including perhaps a ToC listing), its size and repro method, regular columnists, its impact on fandom, or by adding scans or links to scans. See Standards for Publications.