Difference between revisions of "Aristocrat of Science Fiction"

From Fancyclopedia 3
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
([[Palmer]]) A glance at the entry under "[[Palmerism]]" will explain the hilarity which followed [[RAP]]'s application of this tag to [[Amazing Stories]], and the reason why it's quoted solely in sarcastic connections.  
 
([[Palmer]]) A glance at the entry under "[[Palmerism]]" will explain the hilarity which followed [[RAP]]'s application of this tag to [[Amazing Stories]], and the reason why it's quoted solely in sarcastic connections.  
 
   
 
   
from [[Fancyclopedia 2 Supplement]]  ca. 1960: The credit should be ([[T. O'Connor Sloane]]). [[Amazing|Amz]] was {{fixme}} tagged with this long before ZDays; it was the degradation under [[Palmer]] that made the label ludicrous. And [[Galaxy]] and [[F&SF]] have applied the term to themselves, claiming that ''Life'' called them that in an article on [[fandom]] and [[stf]].]
+
from [[Fancyclopedia 2 Supplement]]  ca. 1960: The credit should be ([[T. O'Connor Sloane]]). [[Amazing|Amz]] was tagged with this long before ZDays; it was the degradation under [[Palmer]] that made the label ludicrous. And [[Galaxy]] and [[F&SF]] have applied the term to themselves, claiming that ''Life'' called them that in an article on [[fandom]] and [[stf]].  
 
}}
 
}}
  
 
[[Category:fancy2]]
 
[[Category:fancy2]]

Revision as of 13:53, 1 December 2019

From Fancyclopedia 2, ca. 1959
(Palmer) A glance at the entry under "Palmerism" will explain the hilarity which followed RAP's application of this tag to Amazing Stories, and the reason why it's quoted solely in sarcastic connections.

from Fancyclopedia 2 Supplement ca. 1960: The credit should be (T. O'Connor Sloane). Amz was tagged with this long before ZDays; it was the degradation under Palmer that made the label ludicrous. And Galaxy and F&SF have applied the term to themselves, claiming that Life called them that in an article on fandom and stf.