Difference between revisions of "1979 Worldcon Site Selection"

From Fancyclopedia 3
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Site selection]] for the [[1979]] [[Worldcon]] was conducted by [[SunCon]], the 1977 Worldcon.  The [[bidders]] were [[Britain in '79]] and [[New Orleans in '79]].  [[Britain]] won and went on to run [[Seacon '79]].
+
[[Site selection]] for the 1979 [[Worldcon]] was conducted by [[SunCon]], the 1977 Worldcon.  The [[bidders]] were [[Britain in '79]] and [[New Orleans in '79]].  [[Britain]] won and went on to run [[Seacon '79]].
  
 
There were 884 votes cast. SunCon did not release actual vote counts, but [[Britain in '79]] "overwhelmingly defeated" [[New Orleans in '79]] and the [[WSFS Business meeting]] voted to make the result unanimous.
 
There were 884 votes cast. SunCon did not release actual vote counts, but [[Britain in '79]] "overwhelmingly defeated" [[New Orleans in '79]] and the [[WSFS Business meeting]] voted to make the result unanimous.
Line 10: Line 10:
 
* [[Nashville in '79]] (real bid turned [[hoax bid]])
 
* [[Nashville in '79]] (real bid turned [[hoax bid]])
  
{{bidding | series=Worldcon | year=1979 | before=1978 Worldcon Site Selection | after=1980 Worldcon Site Selection}}
+
{{bidding | year=1979}}
[[Category:bidding]]
 
 
[[Category:World]]
 
[[Category:World]]
 
[[Category:worldcon]]
 
[[Category:worldcon]]

Revision as of 11:50, 21 December 2019

Site selection for the 1979 Worldcon was conducted by SunCon, the 1977 Worldcon. The bidders were Britain in '79 and New Orleans in '79. Britain won and went on to run Seacon '79.

There were 884 votes cast. SunCon did not release actual vote counts, but Britain in '79 "overwhelmingly defeated" New Orleans in '79 and the WSFS Business meeting voted to make the result unanimous.

This was a busy year for bids, though only two of actually appeared on the ballot:


1978 Site Selection 1980 1979
This is page about convention bidding, the competition and its outcome. Please extend it by adding information about who was bidding, and how the race went.